 |
About the Ministry |  |
|
Courts | |
|
Other Ministry Services | |
|
Information & Publications |
|
See also: 2008Prostitution Law Review Committee's report Victoria University: Crime and Justice Research Centre Christchurch School of Medicine 2005The Nature and Extent of the Sex Industry in New Zealand: An Estimation |
Prostitution Law Review Committee
Exiting Prostitution: Models of Best Practice
Prepared for the Ministry of Justice by
Pat Mayhew and Dr Elaine Mossman
Crime and Justice Research Centre
Victoria University of Wellington
DISCLAIMER
This report was commissioned by the Ministry of Justice. The report has been prepared by the authors and the views expressed in it are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Ministry of Justice.
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Categories of sex workers
1.3 Ideological underpinnings of models
of intervention
1.4 Reasons for entering and remaining
in the sex industry
1.5 The case for exiting
2.1 Wanting to exit
2.2 The difficulty of exiting
2.3 Pathways to exiting
2.4 After exiting
2.5 Male and transgender sex workers
Project 1 Awhina Teina, Onehunga,
Auckland
Project 2 Tui House, Nelson
Project 3 Safe House, San Francisco,
California
Project 4 The ‘Mary Magdalene Project’
in South Gate, California
Project 5 St Mungo’s (London)
Project 6 My Life My Choice (Boston)
Boxes
Box A Summary of best practice principles
for exiting interventions
Box 1 Pathways to exiting (Sanders, 2007)
Box 2 Summary of best practice principles
for exiting interventions
Box 3 The five evaluated UK Crime
Reduction Programme projects
Full report PDF Adobe Acrobat v5 139KB
First published in October 2007 by the
Ministry of Justice
PO Box 180
Wellington
New Zealand
© Crown Copyright
ISBN 978-0-478-29050-0
The views, opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are strictly those of the author/s. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the Ministry of Justice. The Ministry of Justice takes no responsibility for any errors or omissions in, or for the correctness of, the information contained in the publication.